Conventional wisdom is a byproduct of groupthink that presents solutions good enough for the average person while simultaneously not being right for any individual. You follow it at your peril. Each Monday I will challenge the investing norms that just may be holding you back from living the life you want.

Unconventional wisdom: Can you value a share just using dividends?

“Human felicity is produced not so much by great pieces of good fortune that seldom happen, as by little advantages that occur every day.”

- Benjamin Franklin

John Burr Williams’ family could trace their lineage in North America back to the first English settlements. He made a significant contribution to the investing world but he was not the only family member who left a mark.

One relative founded Princeton University and had a son who became Vice President of the United States. He was the first of two sitting Vice Presidents to shoot someone while in office. One-upping Dick Cheney he managed to kill his victim. The ‘Burr’ in John Burr Williams was the surname of his infamous forebearer Aaron Burr who killed Alexander Hamilton.

John Burr Williams’ contribution? He invented the dividend discount model. Nobody is going to make a hit Broadway musical with a climactic scene involving the discounting of future dividend payments. Yet that doesn’t mean we should ignore Williams’ contribution.

The search for intrinsic value

John Burr Williams’ story is remarkably similar to his contemporary Benjamin Graham who would later write the Intelligent Investor and teach Warren Buffett how to invest. Williams worked on Wall Street during the 1920s and grew disillusioned with the excess of the market prior to the crash of 1929.

He returned to Harvard to get his PhD in Economics and studied the crash and subsequent depression. His conclusions on what went wrong and how to fix it were captured in his thesis which went on to be published as a book called The Theory of Investment.

His conclusion was that investors needed to focus on the intrinsic value of shares to prevent speculation. Sound familiar? He came up with this eleven years before The Intelligent Investor was published.

Dividends and speculation

Benjamin Graham was one of the early reviewers of The Theory of Investment. In his review Graham wrote:

“The emphasis on the primacy of dividends and the insistence that the value of reinvested earnings is to be found only in increased dividends sound a much-needed warning to Wall Streeters.”

Graham and Williams shared an abhorrence for speculation. Williams wrote his book and Graham the review in the depths of the great depression and one of the worst market environments in history. This context matters.

They were looking for someone to blame and turned their sights on the speculators who dominated the market in the 1920s. This idea of wanting to separate yourself from blatantly ridiculous behaviour makes complete sense to me.

I did the same thing when I became an income investor after the .com bubble burst. I was looking for something tangible that made sense to me after all the meaningless hype. Income investing is methodical, long-term and boringly effective. The perfect contrast to speculation.

Williams agreed and his definition of what separated an investor and a speculator also involved dividends. To him an investor was “a buyer interested in dividends.” In Williams’ opinion this contrasted with a speculator who was just looking for rapid price appreciation.

All these years later the question is simple. Are Williams’ views relics of a bygone era? Can his world view hold up in the age of meme shares, the mostly dividend allergic magnificent seven, and $TRUMP coin?

Is the dividend discount model still useful?

We don’t hear much about the dividend discount model anymore. Yet it forms the basis of how we value almost everything today. The dividends were simply replaced by cashflows.

Williams did not agree with this. He even wrote a poem about dividends. Seriously. I’m not kidding.

“A cow for her milk

A hen for her eggs,

And a stock, by heck,

For her dividends.

An orchard for fruit,

Bees for their honey,

And stocks, besides,

For their dividends.”

He isn’t exactly T.S. Elliot. But it is kind of catchy.

In his poem Williams was pointing out that there are many things in life whose value is dependent on what you can sustainably and consistently get from them. In his view a stock is the same. It is only worth what you can get out of it. I feel the same way.

Investing is often portrayed as an activity that only comprises the twin milestones of the purchase and sale. Obviously, the prices on those days matter. But as a long-term investor the periods in-between matter too.

It is in this no man’s land between a purchase and sale that dividends can improve your life. They can bring you security by providing cash to spend without drawing down principal. They can provide dry powder to take advantage of investment opportunities. They allow you to bank returns in the face of an uncertain future.

A dividend is how the company you partially own makes your life better without having to rely on the vagaries of how much somebody is willing to pay for your ownership stake when you want / need to sell it.

To me that is valuable. For others it may not be. But if you agree with me - and more importantly, Williams - it should factor into the way you evaluate an investment.

How to use dividends to help evaluate a share

Critics will be quick to point out several challenges with a dividend discount model. They include:

  1. The model can only be used on mature companies that pay dividends.
  2. The model is only as accurate as the estimates of future dividends. Once again, this favours mature companies in non-cyclical industries that have narrower ranges of future outcomes. These factors make dividends more predictable.
  3. The model is highly sensitive to the discount rate.  

I’m not particularly concerned with any of these issues. The second and third critiques apply to any discounted cash flow model. Plus, I buy mature companies in boring and predictable industries that pay dividends.

I also don’t create elaborate models. I don’t have the time or interest for that. I make a back of the envelope estimate of what a share is worth – to me. My goal is to create a stream of passive income that grows faster than inflation. Therefore, I focus on estimating future dividends.

To do this I look at the dividend projections from our analysts and I look at the dividend history.

The place I spend my time is trying to understand the company, the competitive environment it operates in, and the overall direction of the industry. This will have the biggest impact of future dividend growth over the long-term.

I can walk through an example. American Tower is a company I’ve been buying at different spots over the last few years. It is a typical company I buy. Fairly boring, reasonably predictable and protected by a moat or sustainable competitive advantage to fend off competitors.

I don’t think there is any excessive risk to American Tower’s business model or competitive positioning in the near term. My work in trying to understand the company forms the basis of my investment thesis. Now I just need to estimate future dividends.

The average annual dividend growth since 2013 has been approximately 20% a year. Our analyst expects the dividend to grow in the high single digits annually for the next five years.

I’ve decided on a 5% annual dividend growth estimate for the next five years for my simplistic model. Over the long-term I’ve modelled out 3% growth and 4% growth scenarios. I think this is a reasonable and conservative estimate.

This is called a two-stage model where there is one set of growth in the more predictable short-term and a different one for the less predictable long-term.

The dividend estimates need to be discounted. There are lots of arguments in the investing world over discount rates. A discount rate is needed because a dollar today is worth more than a dollar in the future. The higher the discount rate the less future dollars are worth.

I focus on me when considering a discount rate and use the return that I need to achieve my goals. It happens to be about 7%. I’ve run two scenarios with a 7% and 8% discount rate.

This gives me a value for American Tower of about $153 if I use 3% long-term dividend growth and an 8% discount rate. If I use a 4% long-term dividend growth rate and a 7% discount rate that gives me a value of about $246.

I’ve included the spreadsheet I used which you can adjust if you would like to play around with it.

Are either of these numbers accurate? Of course not. Is this the most precise model ever? Not even close. Do I care? Nope. I have a ballpark figure of what those estimated future dividends are worth to me.

Over the past two years the shares have traded between $155 and $240. When they have been in the lower range I buy. When they have been in the higher range I do nothing. Our analyst estimate for the fair value is $243 which provides me with comfort.

Final thoughts

I can picture finance professors and professional investors rolling their eyes. They’ve relegated the dividend discount model to the dustbin of history and they would likely be appalled at my back of the envelope approach.

I know all the reasons why they would object to what I’m doing since I was taught the ‘right’ way to value a share during my MBA studies and the Chartered Financial Analyst exams. I would guess the biggest complaint is using dividends in a valuation and ignoring the full cash flows generated by the business.

In my mind – and Williams – the purpose of all those other cash flows is to grow future dividends. That means they are accounted for in the model because it includes future dividends.

The impact of these cash flows are simply delayed which makes it more conservative. This is the argument Graham was making in his review which I quoted earlier.

It is easy to get caught up in the theoretical debate on valuations. But all I’m trying to do is live my life and hope my investments pay off enough for me to have a decent retirement. Maybe turn left at some point boarding a plane.

I try to understand the companies I buy. I leverage the work of our analysts. I do some simplistic calculations. I focus on what is important to me as an income investor.

This is all a means to an end and you don’t win any points for complexity.

Questions? Comments? Dividend poem submissions? Email me at mark.lamonica1@morningstar.com

Get Mark’s insights in your inbox

Read more of Mark’s articles

Read previous editions of Unconventional wisdom

What i’ve been eating

I’ve been to the Mornington several times because I love eating and staying at the Port Phillip Estate. Plus the wine is delicious. Pictured is a grilled Skull Island prawn from the winery’s dining room and a bit of the view out towards Phillip Island. The only Skull Island I’d heard of was King Kong’s home. I was imagining how difficult it must be to catch prawns while being chased by a giant ape. Turns out Skull Island is off the coast of the NT near the mouth of the McArthur River. A bit of a letdown but the prawn served with a bit of butter emulsified in tomato water and sweeted with watermelon still hit the mark.

Prawn